The ceiling was set at a desk you can’t see.

By early August, developers across the Philippines had received about 93 Licenses to Sell from the national housing regulator. In 2025, the same office released 800 to 900.

A License to Sell is the permit that lets a developer legally market or sell condominium units or subdivision lots. No license, no launch. Which means every developer’s launch calendar for the year, every project timeline, every sales team’s pipeline, collapsed to the pace of one office at the Department of Human Settlements and Urban Development.

Anthony Leuterio, who heads the country’s accredited real estate salespersons group, said developers took the backlog to senior government officials directly. “They need to catch up because there will be an issue on the economic side,” he said. “There will be big demand, but housing production will be lower.”

The research head at Colliers Philippines, Joey Roi Bondoc, described the same squeeze from the supply side: “You’re restricting the available supply in the market. If you don’t build now, how can you entice potential buyers?”

The downstream list is long. Slower construction, fewer jobs for engineers and contractors and brokers, weaker demand for building materials, lower tax collections, tighter housing inventory pushing prices up. An entire industry’s output, capped at a counter.

But the sharper problem is what the industry can’t find out. Leuterio formally called on the regulator to publish a full accounting of its approvals for the past six months, broken down by region, category, and project type. The regional office had dismissed reports of delays; developers say they’ve waited months with complete, compliant paperwork. “Transparency is not a threat to government authority; it is the foundation of public trust,” Leuterio said.

Notice what he’s asking for. A number. The industry is rationed to the throughput of a gate it doesn’t control, and the gate declines to say how fast it’s moving. You can plan around a slow approver. An opaque one leaves you guessing with other people’s money.

Your business has these gates, and they don’t appear in your plan because they aren’t your process. The health inspection before the second location opens. The plan review before the addition gets framed. The utility hookup, the liquor license, the bank’s underwriter, the franchisor’s sign-off, the platform’s app review. Your schedule assumes your own pace. The real pace is the slowest external approval on the critical path, and that approver owes you nothing, least of all a published turnaround time.

The Philippine developers’ situation suggests two moves worth making while nothing is on fire.

First, walk your next launch, expansion, or big job and list every point where someone outside your walls has to say yes before you can proceed. That list is your true schedule. Most owners can name their suppliers; far fewer can name their approvers.

Second, put a current number on each one. Ask the permit office what it’s actually running this month, ask the lender, ask the inspector’s scheduler. Where you get a number, plan to it, with margin. Where you can’t get a number, treat the silence as data. A gate that won’t tell you its pace is telling you to build slack in front of it, start the application earlier than feels necessary, and keep something else to sell while you wait. The developers who launched in 2025 planned against an office releasing 800 to 900 licenses a year. This year, through early August, it had released about 93.

So the question the backlog asks: what single approval, signature, or gatekeeper sets the true ceiling on how much your business can launch or ship, whether or not it appears anywhere in your own plan?

← More observations